WANDERLOST captures the essence of that strange period of life after college and before looming adulthood; when idealism is still a good thing, when one must choose to embrace the often mediocre task of mundane existence, or burn free and live according to the principles of our hearts. It is a coming-of-age tale, a humorous road narrative and an acerbically accurate portrayal of modern America Life in all its beauty and futility, written in a personal uninhibited style of journalistic prose.
Ben Olson says, "The book is a backlash to this dumb culture taken over by a crassness of people who are all passionately apathetic. This is a truthful account of a common man's struggle… and that is why it has merit. Sure it's fiction, but I only write fiction because I have to. I need the protection that it provides. Every writer knows that there is no real fiction, for what we put on the page stems from our experiences. I believe in something that will never die – the notion that you can still live free in America."
Ben Olson is only 25 years old and has already had a couple dozen articles published in weekly newspapers and some literary journals. Ben is a prophet howling at the American landscape, a straight shooting voice destined for an impact in American literary circles.
Small Press Bookwatch
August 2007 Home | SPBW Index
"Reading your novel is not in the cards for me I'm afraid."
"What form of inspiration will Olson use to write his next book – spend a month on the streets with the homeless, infiltrate the mob, live with cannibals?"
-Writer's Market, 2008
"The journey takes the reader not just through evocative descriptions of the changing landscape, but through the highly charged and personal musings of a young writers as he grapples with which direction he wants to go. Gritty and at times graphically intense, it is also a witty, insightful and humorous exploration of how to balance freedom with obligation and what it means to be a young American in the 21st century."
-The Sandpoint Reader
"Here is a writer howling at the American landscape and destined to become an American writer of significance. The torch has been passed…"
- Nathan Jordon – Jack Kerouac School of Disembodied Poets
"Ben Olson… has seen and done more in his 25 years than most of us will ever do."
- North Idaho Lifestyles Magazine
"PLEASE buy this book… get this fucking guy off my couch!"
- Marisa Fenarjian (allows Olson to sleep on her couch)
"This man will not live to see 30… it's a new movement, a movement like I've never seen before… art for bums… ignore his hard drinking, his distorted politics and his hair-brained theories, his utter grimness, his cathartic experiences, his constant cycling between satori and ennui and go straight to the humanness of his work, wherein Max, this uncommon common man, makes common mistakes in a messy world."
-Erin Brannigan – Former Professional Racquetball Player, Art Thief, Master of Bullshit, Poet, an Ordinary Man Himself.
"Never heard of it."
- Chevron Station Attendant – San Francisco, CA
"GODLESS" by Drew Stepek, who says "Godless is free of the burdens of myth. and is about the death of God in our society and how it leads an individual down a path of self-destruction."
"The power of an idea (or God) is revealed by its fruits ... Drew Stepek has strong opinions on everything from Bush to Bolemia and an entertaining presentation. His personality has recently captivated national television audiences," ... Publisher's review.
UPLAND ROAD is a dark novel about the legacy of
abuse, suffering, and terrible choices. Lillian, the daughter of a
drunkard, awakes from a lifetime of drugs and the spectre of past
sexual abuse. Facing life sober, she is haunted by her abortion of her
lovechild. Burdened by remorse, she tells the father, Dylan, the
terrible secret. The child she has lost continues to haunt her--until the nightmares give way to reality. Her limbo child has
been reborn and is demanding her attention. Both Lillian and Dylan search
for self-awareness, forgiveness, and the path to a "normal" life... but why does Lillian's life follow closely that of Hine nui te Po; a godess of the native creation story of Aotearoa--where incest and abortion are foundations of the very beginning.
Midwest Bookreview, 2008
HILLARY by Dr. THOMAS MOORE: http://www.midwestbookreview.com 2008
bridges fiction and nonfiction to tell a strange if true story of coded
secrets, psychotic delusions, mathematical truth, and lies. This story
of greatness and weakness, of genius and hallucination, is based on the
parallel lives of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Newt Gingrich,
Carmella Meeks, (a sophisticated prostitute) and Tony Chaytor, the
great investigative journalist.
together their work proved that truth is elusive, that knowledge has
limits, and that structure can reveal past corruption. Tony Chaytor was
devoted to truth of the highest abstract nature, yet was unable to
grasp the mundane truths of his own life. Through it all, the narrator
wonders, along with these odd heroes, if any of us can ever really
grasp the truth. Dr. Thomas Moore masterfully brings these great
characters together in a slightly fictionalized version of their lives.
novel is no mere assemblage of biographical transcriptions. We are very
much within the mind of an unreliable narrator, one whose dark
obsessions resonate with the version of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama,
and Newt Gingrich, along with the sexy Carmella and the
whistle-blowing Tony Chaytor.
THE PROGRESS OF MAN
is created as a parody and biography of President George W. Bush. The
satirical main character, Dubya, loves his wife "Liberty Bell", yet his
relationships are riven with tragedy and dysfunction, particularly his
relationship with God and his eternal antagonist, "We The People". The
freewheeling humor spares no one from its relentless mocking - not the
childlike "We The People" who re-elect Dubya as an expression of its
parochial desires, not Al Gore, who Dubya contacts to wage war on the
environment, and not Liberty Bell, whom Dubya takes on a second
honeymoon to a fall-out shelter. A viciously tongue-in-cheek read
featuring foibles galore.
Small Press Bookwatch
Volume 6, Number 6 June 2007 Home | SPBW Index
WE ALL FALL DOWN: Yes, the Antichrist is evil and his agents are vivisecting nightmares from splatterpunk fiction. Anyone who understood that would never accept his mark; certainly not now, when the visible fulfillment of the prophecies of the Book of Revelation proves that the Second Coming of Christ is less than seven years distant. But wouldn't making a decision for Christ be, well, inauthentic? That's the existential decision that the remarkably foul-mouthed Jimmy Lordan has to make during the Tribulation period in this equally remarkable riff on the now-familiar themes of the apocalyptic novel.
The theme song for this book should probably be The Day the Ravens Left the Tower by the Alarm, a Welsh evangelical rock-band that used to open for U2 25 years ago. The song is about the legend that England would end when the ravens leave the Tower of London; the song ends with the rhyme, "Ring around the Rosie," which is also recited in the course of the book. The connection of the song to the book is speculative, but the Generation-X edginess is obvious enough. The protagonist is a member of that generation, a teacher of English at a high school in Michigan but a native of Boston, a city to which he returns twice in the course of the story. (The book is in three acts, rather like a screenplay, and they are presented nonsequentially.) We see Jimmy sliding into early middle age in the early 21st century after his devout wife disappears in the Rapture and the world begins to come apart at the seams.
The pre-tribulation millenarianism that the story assumes is explained only in briefest outline. This is quite unlike the custom in apocalyptic novels, whose primary point is usually to inform the reader of the details of that eschatology. We get just a glimpse of the Antichrist (one Sir Richard Grant Morrison) and that only on television, when he welcomes the sadly depopulated United States into the One World Community. The story is not about world history, but the choices that cosmic catastrophe bring to Jimmy. Readers accustomed to the air-brushed atrocities of the Left Behind series may well be shocked by what they read in this book. As Jimmy explains to the penitent homosexual who tries to help him perform at least one good deed before the Second Coming:
"George, do you have any idea how many times in the last few years I've woken up without the slightest fucking clue where I was and what was happening? My wife disappeared from my bed, I watched my father get shot in the face, I thought I was going to die in a nuclear attack, I spent a month getting tortured, a building I was in collapsed, killing everyone but me. I've wandered insane through the Israeli desert, spent two years surrounded by Christ-freaks in a camp protected by God, a month on a prison ship watching kids get raped. I've been beaten by an ex-student who worked in a death camp and got attacked by a swarm of locusts."
Actually, Jimmy's adventures are even worse than that, because here Jimmy is telling only what happened to him, not what he himself did. There is quite a lot of graphic sex in this book. It's not gratuitous, since it serves to establish character, but it is often vindictive.
The Rapture in this book serves to set us a philosophical puzzle by removing metaphysical doubt. Suppose we knew for a fact that theism is true, as we well might surmise in the face of the clockwork fulfillment of the pre-tribulation Endtime scenario. Obviously, the worship of God would then be advisable on utilitarian grounds. However, does the power of God make it morally imperative that we love Him?
This is not a new question. The Book of Job is the text to which all other treatments of the matter are commentaries. In this connection, Immanuel Kant laid down the principle that a command, even the sort of command that God seems to spend so much of His time issuing in the Bible, cannot be the basis of a moral duty. Perhaps the most entertaining relatively recent treatment of the issue in fiction is Robert Heinlein's Answer to Job. That book, too, is set during the Endtime, indeed during the Endtime in several parallel universes. Theodicy fails to justify the arbitrary salvation and damnation of the characters; in the end, God Himself is ultimately convicted of tyranny. The problem with that conclusion, though, is that it rather incoherently appeals to a justice that transcends God. We All Fall Down takes the issue in a more radical direction. We see it stated here by Jimmy's highly amputated cellmate, Stan, as he explains why he once refused to inform on a prison gang that had abused him:
"You wanna keep saying no, then ya better find your Inch, boy. Find it and protect it. Ya can cry and scream and beg and curse. Ya can do any damn thing ya gotta do to get through it, but as long as you don't say yes, you win. Long as ya keep yer Inch for yerself, long as ya don't pussy out and give it to Morrison or God, you win. You win and they lose."
The power not to say "yes" seems even more intolerable to Antichrist's government than mere Christianity. As is usual in apocalyptic fiction, people who refuse to receive the mark of the Beast are arrested. Receiving the mark is called "tagging" here; as has also become a literary commonplace, it means you need an implanted microchip in your hand to buy or sell. The authorities quickly execute the Christians, once it is clear they are sincere. In contrast, the authorities take infinite pains with the small number of people who have not converted to Christianity but who refuse to be tagged as a matter of personal integrity. They beat the recusants in ingenious ways over a period of weeks; by and by they snip off ever more noticeable bits of them, all the while engaging in the sort of thoughtful dialogue familiar to us from O'Brien's exchanges with Winston in 1984. Jimmy's rudeness during these sessions is stunning, but then, as we slowly come to realize, Jimmy is a genuinely bad man.
Jimmy's refusal to give an Inch, in fact, raises the question whether the evil in this book comes in two distinct varieties. There is the garden-variety evil of those who willingly follow Antichrist. They worship an object unworthy of worship, and therefore suffer a fitting decline in their sanity and physical condition. Then there are the elite of the damned, people like Jimmy and his father and Stan. Their whole motivation shrinks to the defense of their personal integrity, which is defined in an amoral, even ahedonic way. In normal times, perhaps, one might take this supernal stubbornness for ordinary existentialism: the existentialist defines as real what he would be willing to die for. As an aside, we may note that this solidifying of the self into an entity that acts without regard to desire is also the goal of certain esotericists. The adamantine self becomes a "body of light" divorced from time, and so immortal. The preservation of the self through the rejection of the rest of reality might, in another view, be thought to be nothing more than the construction of a personal Hell. The author of We All Fall Down may well have intended to make just this point.
There is another perspective that the book does not consider, however. Though Jimmy's recusal from the demands of both God and the Devil is not presented as admirable, it is presented as unanswerable. The final defense of the self is made to seem as self-evident a choice as the acceptance of salvation, even if the final outcome of that defense is completely horrible. This equation is not just ill-advised, however; it may also be merely mistaken.
We should note that the discernment of the absolute self has not always been thought to lead to an inescapable spiritual black hole. The method of contemplative prayer described in The Cloud of Unknowing is based on the premise that, when the contemplative strips away all desires, fears, and distractions, all that remains is the naked desire for God. Furthermore, only someone who has already become virtuous in conventional ways can hope to clarify his basic nature for this purpose.
If that example seems too esoteric for Stan's Inch, then consider that it is precisely in those extreme situations of danger, when recourse to moral theory is impractical, that many people first encounter the moral life. This is the truth of which existentialism is a caricature. There are circumstances in which moral imperatives are experienced as both commands and discoveries. Kant had a point when he said that a command from one human being to another cannot create a moral duty, but he was wrong when he assumed that experience cannot be commanding. In this sense, the moral life can be said to be a direct experience of the substance of God.
At the risk of taxing the concept behind the book with more analysis than it should be required to bear, let me also suggest that the choice for salvation and the defense of the Inch may not be so incompatible as We All Fall Down takes for granted. Readers may be familiar with the C.S. Lewis novel, That Hideous Strength. It involves an occult conspiracy that could well have been the beginning of the Endtime, if it had been permitted to get off the ground. The story includes another interview between an interrogator and a victim whom the interrogator is trying to convince to make a decision very like the one the forces of Antichrist were trying to foist on Jimmy Lordan. The victim in the Lewis novel refuses, too, He does not refuse because of theological scruples, but because he sees that what he is being asked to do would be the end of him in some more fundamental way than merely dying. However, far from being the event horizon of a spiritual black hole, the victim's refusal is his first discovery of the moral life, and then of the transcendent. In deciding to resist, he had decided, all unknowing, to fight on the side of the angels in whom he did not believe. In other words, by defending his Inch, he had also accepted the grace of salvation.
This book uses eschatology to simplify certain questions, which is fair enough. Still, I could not help wondering as I read what would happen to the logic of the story if complications had been introduced. Suppose anonymous Christians had been raptured?